Archived experiment · not the current product

Pangram 4.0 · 14 types · brief vs keep · 2 September 2026

LENGTH WAS A CONFOUND.
SO WE KEPT THE FAILURE.

This early experiment compared short public-domain collages with outputs padded back to source length. Repeated generated asides dominated the result. It is preserved here as a lab record, not as evidence that shortening text makes it human.

Brief condition
12 / 14
Entire-text scans labelled Human
Keep condition
0 / 14
Entire-text scans labelled Human
Best Keep result
53%
Human share for Speech
Observed Keep length
103–106%
Of source word count

What this run actually isolated

Attested openers often stayed human while repeated generated filler shifted the scan. That finding killed the padding strategy; it did not validate a detector-bypass product.

Human share · Brief vs Keep

Pangram 4.0 human-written percent. Green is the short collage. Orange is the same type at Keep length. These are detector outputs, not authorship judgments.

Brief (105–219 words) Keep (~1,000–1,300 words)

Rendering the 14-type comparison…

Full matrix

Credits: Brief 2905→2876 (29). Keep 2876→2718 (158). Detector: Pangram 4.0 dashboard, Individual plan. “Human” and “AI” below reproduce its recorded labels.

Rendering 14 recorded rows…

Word counts and recorded Pangram 4.0 shares by text type
Type Source words Brief words Keep words Brief human Keep human Keep AI
Rendering recorded outcomes…

Method & provenance

Enough detail to interpret the archive without turning an exploratory dashboard run into a product claim.

01 / DESIGN

One paired length comparison

Fourteen text types each supplied a short public-domain collage (“Brief,” 105–219 words) and a generated output padded toward the source length (“Keep,” roughly 1,000–1,300 words).

Evidence map

The source rows, generated artifacts, and manually recorded detector outcomes remain linked by hashes in the research fixtures. The visual below is an editorial illustration, not a detector screenshot.

Abstract archive of document fragments connected to quality checkpoints
Experiment archive · document lineage, quality checks, and recorded outcomes.